Welcome

Welcome to Fly fishing and Fly Tying magazine's website, once you register, you'll gain access to the Blogs, Forum and Shop.

If you cannot register successfully, contact us.

Member Login

Lost your password?

Search This Site

Farmoor static line fishing ban

A reasonable and sensible move by Thames Water


Farmoor Reservoir welcomes a truer form of fly fishing.
Farmoor Reservoir welcomes a truer form of fly fishing.

There's been a rumour going round that Thames Water has banned Booby fishing at Farmoor.

Tosh. Nothing of the sort. What has been placed in the rules is this:

24. Static line fishing with fly fishing tackle is strictly forbidden on all of the Company’s reservoir trout fishing facilities including the use of fixed rod rest applications. Hand held fishing techniques are to be used at all times in traditional ‘cast and draw’ method. Fast stripping is permitted. Clarification of the rule dictates that when a line is in the water the rod must be held by the angler at all times with no acceptions [I think they meant 'exceptions' ...].

Some will see this as the end of the world as we know it. Others, certainly the locals who fish Farmoor, will not.

I say to 'hallelujah' for the brave step, one that many would deem overdue. The sight of a trout reservoir bristling with rods clamped in holders rather similarly to Herne Bay pier dab and dogfish fishers using Lug and rag, was a little unedifying. We almost expected the bells or bite alarms to sing out across the Oxfordshire countryside.

Banning anything is always going to court controversy. On Farmoor where fishing the Booby is almost as ingrained in the angling psyche as the concrete around the perimeter, it is a strike to the heart of many season ticket and veterans' tactics. But let’s be clear, Boobies have not been banned – the static and clamped styles of rods being strapped to various devices and left to fish unaided and unmoved, has. It seems sensible to me.

Boobies are allowed, just as long as they are fished in a conventional way and in motion. Like … wait a minute…fly fishing! What is so outrageous about that?

I wanted to know the reasons behind such a neo-controversial move on the part of Thames Water and the management of the fishery. One of the head bailifs went through the rules with me, commenting that only a handful of hardcore veterans had railed against the decision to stop fixed-rod/rod-rest angling. He was amused to report that some of the anglers had been getting “creative,” but with improved policing and a new ticketing regime that is offering a far better catch return procedure than in the past, things are looking very good at this exceptional fishery.Further, he remarked that the improved water height and weather had rejuvenated the midge hatches and all was looking exceptionally good for a fine season ahead.

Incidentally, the sight (pun hideously meant!) of indicators the same approximate dimensions of pike bungs, will not be seen either; indicators are now restricted to 20mm. Perfectly reasonable, perfectly sensible.

Interestingly, I asked some of the England Youth fly fishers who have a fund-raising competition on the reservoir at the beginning of May (the first, I think) what they thought of it all. Every one of them applauded the move.

Let’s here it for common sense and resurgence of fly fishing – in a truer form.
 

Existing comments


Personally I've nothing against static lines or rod holders. What I cant understand is how this can be enforced. Surely 99% of dry fly fishing is performed with a static line. A shuttlecock or shipmans arcing on the breeze is one of the most effective methods on any water. If you get a good position on a headland or point it can take up to 10 minutes to fish through an arc. Thats 10 minutes without retrieve or draw. The same can be said of buzzer/nymph fishing or trolling a tube fly for overwintered fish.

By Bob Morgan on 2011 03 17


I agree Entirely with the proposals they have put in place, to me fly fishing is about fooling a fish using movement. No natural food sits dead still for hours waiting for a predator to come along. Unless of course that food source is already dead, therefore i cant understand the usage of boobies in such a way.... there are always going to be pro's and con's to a particular way of fishing and i think this is one that should definately be kept on the low especially at a prominent fishery such as farmoor, what kind of a message must it send to our friends from other countries when they come here to fish such places and sea fly fishermen employing coarse fishing tactics such as this. Thames water have done the right thing in my belief, anyone who doesn't like the new rules will have to adapt, just as we must adapt to things we dont like. Think of the conservation issue if you lose a fish that is deeply hooked on a booby you have pretty much consigned it to a slow death. Thank god there is one less reason for this to happen now. Regards Tom.

By riveritchentom on 2011 03 22


Last line of your comment - I think you meant 'hear' in lieu of 'here'. Sorry CJ smile

By cookie on 2011 04 17


Leave your comment below

You must first login or register to leave comments

Back to top

Search the site