Welcome to Fly fishing and Fly Tying magazine's website, once you register, you'll gain access to the Blogs, Forum and Shop.

If you cannot register successfully, contact us.

Member Login

Lost your password?

Search This Site

Environment watchdog labelled ‘lapdog’ after agreeing to keep fish farm deaths secret

Scotland’s environment watchdog has bowed to pressure from the salmon farming industry to keep the number of fish killed by diseases secret, according to a report in the Sunday Herald (October 20).

The Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) agreed to delete information on millions of fish deaths from a public database on fish farming launched this month because the Scottish Salmon Producers’ Association (SSPO), the salmon farming industry's representative body, argued it would be commercially damaging. An anti-fish-farm campaigner has accused SEPA of acting like the industry’s “lapdog”. Because the database also omits crucial information on sea lice, it is no more than “spin”, he claimed.

In February the Sunday Herald revealed that the number of farmed salmon killed by diseases had leapt to over 8.5 million in 2012. This compared to 6.8 million deaths in 2011 and 5.5 million in 2010, and was blamed mostly on the spread of amoebic gill disease (AGD).

A few days after the report appeared, the SSPO’s chairman, Phil Thomas, wrote to SEPA’s chief executive, James Curran, accusing SEPA of “fundamentally poor regulatory practice.” Thomas argued that SEPA had “no justifiable need” to collect and make available information on the numbers of fish mortalities, saying: “You were potentially placing information in the public domain which could be used to the commercial detriment or competitive market disadvantage of the companies submitting the data,” Thomas wrote. “You were in fact providing competitor companies both within and outwith the UK with significant market and business information."

In reply, Curran said he understood SSPO’s concerns. He promised that in future it would be made clear that for most fish farms supplying information on the number of deaths was voluntary. He added: “Although numbers of mortalities do appear in the current version of Scotland’s aquaculture database which is being launched to partner organisations soon, it is our intention to make a small change to ensure that these data on the numbers of mortalities are not included in the version released to the public.”

The long-delayed database was published on October 1 by the Scottish Government. Although it includes the weight of fish that have died, it omits the numbers – which critics say masks the scale of the problem when the fish are small.

Don Staniford, a veteran campaigner who is now director of a new environmental group, Protect Wild Scotland, said: “Shame on SEPA for morphing into the salmon farming industry's lapdog. Surely SEPA’s statutory duty is to protect the Scottish environment not cravenly kowtow to the Norwegian-owned salmon farming industry?”

The correspondence between SEPA and the SSPO was released to Staniford under Freedom of Information law. He pointed out that the new database also ignored vital data on the sea lice that often infest caged salmon and threaten wild fish. “The Scottish government is promoting a false salmon farming economy based on spin and deception instead of a healthy local economy based upon Scotland’s wild salmon,” he contended.

Guy Linley-Adams, solicitor to the Salmon and Trout Association (Scotland), argued that the lack of weekly site-specific sea lice data was an “obvious gap” in the database. “It is looking increasingly silly of the Scottish Government to refuse to require that data to be published,” he said.

James Curran, pictured left, has worked in environmental science and regulation for over 30 years. Prior to being appointed as Chief Executive he worked as SEPA's Head of Science and then its Head of Environmental Strategy. In 2007 he was awarded the MBE for services to the environment.

In November 2010 the the Scottish Government made a policy U-turn in the face of SSPO pressure, including the threat of legal action, over the publishing of salmon farm sea lice data.

• The letter from the Scottish Salmon Producers’ Organisation can be downloadedd HERE and the reply from SEPA HERE.

Back to top

Search the site